- Randy Forshey has some beautiful work at his web site JustShootMeStudios.com. You'll also find a cool page there shows you the kind of equipment he uses. (Thanks Randy).
- http://www.panoramas.se/index_eng.htm#
Here's the link list so far:
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials.htm
This one on Diffraction & Photography caught my eye:
Diffraction Limited Photography: Pixel Size, Aperature and Airy Disks
Bob Johhnson has a great artical on Diffraction issues at EarthBoundLight.com.
Diffraction: When Smaller Apertures No Longer Mean Sharper Pictures. He mentions it on a this Nikonian post
Interesting reading at Nikonians.com:
The Nikkor 18-200 VR is a good example
And the discussion of the Nikkor 18-200 VR goes on here
The Nikkor 70-200 VR doesn't seem to have this issue
But 4x5s look like a great alternative for that shot which has amazing detail and unbeliveable DOF.
This 4x5 article by Ken Rockwell has definitly got me thinking. But the cost of renting a darkroom or having a lab develop the film will be a factor.
I'd like to try street shooting with a 4x5. Set it up, get your framing, focus, light readings right and ... wait for the picture, wait for the faces you want to see to walk right to you, and click, a silent, discreet little snap from the shutter cable.
It's not instantaneous, it's not high tech, but man can you imagine the beauty of those images when you get it right. It would be laborous, but it could be amazing, as evidenced by the body of work already made this way.
I'm looking for a portrait lens, the Zeiss ZF 85mm f1.4 is looking like a very compeling choice. Here are links I'm reviewing on the topic:
Nikkor 28mm F/1.4 DOF Chart
Larger Chart
I thought there must be something wrong with my Manfrotto head because it vibrates and seems flimsy to me. To my suprise the reviewer found that all of the 3 heads he reviewed exhibited "sag", which when bad enough requires the photographer to shim the camera on the bracket. It's pretty unbeliveable that you can pay so much money for a pan head and have this problem.
Really Right Stuff (RRS) has a panorama head that looks nice. I wonder if it has the sag problem
After some false starts I now understand how to setup the Manfroto 303SPH Panorama head
Find and record the center and nodal point settings for each lens you want to use with your panorama head (and for zooms I believe this will be focal length specific). In addition determine the degrees you'll use in rotations in both vertical and horizontal directions.
I'm testing out my lens setups in my apartment and carefully recording the settings for each. By pretesting and recording a lens setup, time in the field can be used to focus on the shot.
Recorded settings are not helpful unless you put the 303SPH together the same way each time. The above pictures detail the head setup I use. Heres what I have so far:
* I align the camera base plate white line with the indentation in the bottom of the Nikon D2X body closest to the tripod mount.
Nikon D2X camera body bottom and 303SPH camera base plate, Larger View
Some Other Info:
Kekus thread on Manfrotto 303SPH compliactions
Fortunately I found a great hyperfocal thread on on Nikonians and feel empowered. Add to that my new Katz Eye split prism focus screen (also discovered on Nikonians), when it comes an I'll be close to having the focusing and DOF control I used to have with my old Yashica :-/ Here are some links related to this quest:
Topic: How can I calculate hyperfocal distance? Question My lens doesn't have depth-of-field scales. How do I calculate the hyperfocal distance? Answer For any Nikkor lens that does not have a depth-of-field scale, hyperfocal distances can be calculated manually for any focal length and aperture combination by using the formula: H = f2 / F (0.033) where "H" is the hyperfocal distance in mm, "f" is the focal length, and "F" is the aperture. For example, with a 50mm lens set at f/8, H = 50x50 / 8 x 0.033, so H is 9470mm (9.47 meters or approximately 31 feet). Setting the focus on the lens to this distance will render subjects from half this distance to infinity acceptably sharp.
These 2 goals are different in that a billboard prints needs a lower DPI than an Art Magazine. But the both have several things in common, (1) the underlying starting point is a D2X NEF, (2) they can both make you money, i.e. these are essential commercial workflows.
The published work I've done so far was only for a small magazine and newsletter, but I want to change that!
This blog entry will be updated with info and links as I find out more of the secrets of the big picture / fine art post processing.
Links so far
Some questions:
Nikon D2X Resolution to DPI Chart
Larger Chart
More to come...
http://www.planetneil.com/nikon/custom-curves.html
Which was embedded in the following Nikonian link: http://www.nikonians.org/dcforum/DCForumID79/8.html#0